On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:55:27PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 22:54 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > so I'm seeing this funny thing where an EFI region changes when we enter
> > efi_enter_virtual_mode when booting with edk2 on kvm. Here's the diff:
> 
> Perhaps the [email protected] list should be in Cc?

Good idea and message repeated below.

One more thing: I'm using a self-built OVMF with top commit from March:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r14165 | sfu5 | 2013-03-06 02:42:04 +0100 (Wed, 06 Mar 2013) | 4 lines

Fix a bug that IsSignatureFoundInDatabase() incorrectly computes CertCount.

---

Hi guys,

so I'm seeing this funny thing where an EFI region changes when we enter
efi_enter_virtual_mode when booting with edk2 on kvm. Here's the diff:

--- before      2013-07-31 22:20:52.316039492 +0200
+++ after       2013-07-31 22:21:30.960731706 +0200
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ efi: mem07: type=2, attr=0xf, range=[0x0
 efi: mem08: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0x0000000040000000-0x000000007c000000) 
(960MB)
 efi: mem09: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0x000000007c000000-0x000000007c020000) 
(0MB)
 efi: mem10: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0x000000007c020000-0x000000007e0ad000) 
(32MB)
-efi: mem11: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0x000000007e0ad000-0x000000007e0cc000) 
(0MB)
+efi: mem11: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0x000000007e0ad000-0x000000007e0ad000) 
(0MB)
 efi: mem12: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0x000000007e0cc000-0x000000007e0cd000) 
(0MB)
 efi: mem13: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0x000000007e0cd000-0x000000007e55d000) 
(4MB)
 efi: mem14: type=3, attr=0xf, range=[0x000000007e55d000-0x000000007e59c000) 
(0MB)

That second boundary of region mem11 suddenly changes *before* we merge
the regions. edk2 bug?

Whole dmesg attached.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

Attachment: test-x86_64.log.gz
Description: Binary data

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to