> On Nov 8, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> wrote: > >> >> I’m not saying this is the right solution, but we should ask the >> question should we tie the override to the build_rule.template file >> sections vs. trying to override the contents of these actions. That >> is just a good thing for all of use to think about. For example are >> we overriding .S or Assembly-Code-File? > > Yeah. I see that build_rule has some interaction. But, I'm not sure > exactly what mechanism causes '.asm' files to get ignored when > building with GCC toolchains. It is certainly convenient. :) >
The Assembly-Code-File rule has different input file matching based on compiler family. https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2/BaseTools/Conf/build_rule.template [Assembly-Code-File.COMMON.COMMON] <InputFile.MSFT, InputFile.INTEL, InputFile.RVCT> ?.asm, ?.Asm, ?.ASM <InputFile.GCC> ?.S, ?.s Thanks, Andrew Fish
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
