Horst Kraemer wrote on 2/27/00 9:04 PM:
>On Sun, 27 Feb 2000 19:17:13 -0600, "William Chambers"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> I am sure you feel almost like a real doctor (MD).
>
>
>> Listen to me little man.
>
>
>> Now grow up and have a conversation with me. How in the world do people
>> like you get jobs in universities.
>
>
>
>Stop depositing your faeces in newsgroups. Go to a public toilet.
Wow! William Chambers is still around?? I mean, this guy has been pushing
that Corresponding regressions stuff for *years* and he still hasn't
gotten anyone to bite???
Bill! There's a clue here for you! Nobody is biting because there is
nothing to it. What you observe and make great hay about in corresponding
regressions is a natural consequence of the data sets and is
uninterpretable and meaningless. But I posted that years ago... no need
to go there again.
Not to say that Rubin can't be pompous, he often is. Be that as it may,
he is also correct about the fundamental failure of substance in your
corresponding regressions baloney.
Paul
===========================================================================
This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, less thoughtful
people send inappropriate messages. Please DO NOT COMPLAIN TO
THE POSTMASTER about these messages because the postmaster has no
way of controlling them, and excessive complaints will result in
termination of the list.
For information about this list, including information about the
problem of inappropriate messages and information about how to
unsubscribe, please see the web page at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===========================================================================
