In article <007201bfb639$d40ee400$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David A. Heiser) wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Warren Sarle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 12:23 PM
> Subject: Re: no correlation assumption among X's in MLR
>
> > Of course Herman is right (as usual)! Where are people getting this
> > ridiculous idea that correlation and collinearity are the same
thing?
>
............................................................................
> ..................................
> Statistics is one field that has almost no agreed on usage of terms.
> Everybody is independent.

Horsedoodle. David A. Heiser is so thoroughly confused that I see
no point in trying to argue with him.



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.


===========================================================================
This list is open to everyone.  Occasionally, less thoughtful
people send inappropriate messages.  Please DO NOT COMPLAIN TO
THE POSTMASTER about these messages because the postmaster has no
way of controlling them, and excessive complaints will result in
termination of the list.

For information about this list, including information about the
problem of inappropriate messages and information about how to
unsubscribe, please see the web page at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===========================================================================

Reply via email to