it is very difficult to set a "price" on a course ... between and within 
institutions ... especially even within an institution since, workloads 
vary and job responsibilities vary ...

it would indeed be an interesting accounting exercise for an institution to 
implement ... trying to figure out just how much (say by rank) "advising" 
is worth ... "teaching" is worth ... "committee work" is worth .... and so 
on ...

it is like places that have tried to define faculty workload by some sort 
of a point system ... teaching a graduate leve course = 3 points, advising 
a doctoral student = 4 points, serving on a college level committee = 2 
points, doing an "independent study" with a student = 2 points ... and then 
saying that a full load = 65 points ... or some such number ... these 
systems don't work ... faculty life and responsibilities are more complex 
than that

At 02:10 AM 8/9/00 -1000, Daniel Blaine wrote:

>On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Mark Glickman wrote:
>
> > In sci.stat.edu Petr Kuzmic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > : How? Just cut out any lecture preparation (teach from the book), grading
> > : (you _do_ have a grader), supervision (the TA should know what s/he's
> > : doing in discussion, and if they don't it's not your fault), don't
> > : answer any email from students, and limit your office hours to 45
> > : minutes per week.
> >
> > I'm mystified that my post has generated such a negative reaction.
> > [...]  I, personally, spend quite a bit more than 10 hours per week
> > per class (writing up handouts, web-related material, etc.)
>
>On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Bob Hayden wrote:
>
> > Part-time lecturers are underpaid everywhere.  Let's not all dump on
> > BU who is paying them better than most places do.
> > --
>         I think one of the real problems in communication we have here
>         is one of what is the "going rate" for a course.  Here
>         (University of Hawaii at Manoa) we would jump at a course for
>         $5K since we're not even close to that (here we're locked into
>         a "rank" thing so the "going rate" is a function of one's
>         academic rank).  All figuring aside, $5K for a course is way
>         above most of our scales.  Hell, at the advertised rate, I
>         considered it myself!  Aloha.  -dan
>--
>         Daniel D. Blaine                University of Hawaii at Manoa
>         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]      http://www2.hawaii.edu/~daniel/
>
>
>
>=================================================================
>Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
>the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
>                   http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
>=================================================================



=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================

Reply via email to