Hola!

For a more robust test, which not assumes equal centers, use the
fligner-Killeen test.

Kjetil Halvorsen

Glen Barnett wrote:
> 
> Rich Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > On Sat, 09 Feb 2002 16:59:34 GMT, Johannes Fichtinger
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear NG!
> > > I have been searching for a description of the Ansari-Bradley dispersion
> test up to now for
> > > analysing a psychological research. I am searching for a description of
> this test, specially a
> > > description how to use the test.
> > >
> > > Please, can you tell me, how to use the test, or show me a link, where it
> is described?
> > > Thank you very much in advance,
> >
> > I plugged Ansari-Bradley  into a search by  www.google.com  and
> > there were 287  hits.  The first page contained the (aptly named)
> >
> >
> http://franz.stat.wisc.edu/~rossini/courses/intro-nonpar/text/Specifications_fo
> r_the_Ansari_Bradley_Test.html
> >
> > I suggest repeating the search.  That also eliminates the "pasting"
> > problem if your reader has broken  the long URL into two lines.
> 
> A warning, however; the Ansari-Bradley test (and similar tests like the
> Seigel-Tukey) has some drawbacks:
> i) it assumes the locations are identical
> ii) it is less powerful than some alternative tests
> 
> If assumption (i) is false, the A-B test may have very little power to detect a
> difference in variance.
> 
> Glen
> 
> =================================================================
> Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
> problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at
>                   http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
> =================================================================


=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at
                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================

Reply via email to