Paul R Swank wrote:
> 
> If in fact the data points are bad, that is indefensible, and replaced by
> missing values then I would suggest using a mixed models approachj with
> Maximum Likelihood estimation. This will not result in listwise deletion and
> is generally preferable to GLM because of its greater flexibility. SAS
> MIXED, MLwin, HLM5 and SPSS 11 all have the ability to do the mixed model
> approach.

That's probably what I'd do, though with small samples multiple imputation and
standard analyses might be better. AFAIK the results from MI and
mixed/multilevel models should be pretty similar as the key thing is the
assumptions about the nature of missingness (MAR MCAR etc.). I think the
mixed/multilevel approach ought to be roughly equivalent to MI assuming MAR.

Thom
.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================

Reply via email to