Hi,

One of my collegues is working on a report to provide feedback to a
number of organisation that have provided data to us.  One of these
statistics collected was how many weeks did it take to fill a vacancy.
 In reporting this statistic back to the organisations my collegue
asked whether she should use the mean or the median.  The reply from
her supervisor was "if the results are normally distributed then use
the mean otherwise use the median".  I am sure this is sage advice,
but why?  I would have thought that if the distribution was normally
distributed then the mean and the median would be roughly similar
figures since the normal curve has the frequency distributed around
the mean.  My further thinking about this was that for any
distribution the mean will always be the upper bound of the median. 
Is this correct?
.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================

Reply via email to