"Maximum Likelihood, Phil, *is*  a really big workhorse of
statistical estimation, partly because the ML solutions
share certain fine characteristics ...  which I don't call to
mind."
 
We're sure you don't.  Rumsfeld and Bush have similar problems.  But I'll give you a hint:  Focus on the fine characteristics--use estimating procedures that have them.  (And MLE's do under extremely restrictive and unrealistic assumptions normally satisfied only in the academically large.)


Rich Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 18 Mar 2004 05:59:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phillip
Good) wrote:

> As I suspected you are unable to offer a single justification
> for your actions just as Rumsfield was unable to offer a single
> justification for his. Given your recklessness, may I recommend
> "Common Errors in Statistics (and How to Avoid Them)," Wiley, 2003.
>
> Phillip Good
[ snip, 145 lines of previous stuff - apparently starting with
the topic of Maximum Likelihood solutions.]

Top-posting is not the usual custom in the sci.stat.* groups.

Snipping out extraneous comments is a friendly custom -- I
am seldom pleased to see a 119-line post followed by 151-line
post, which is the same thing plus headers /tags plus 4 lines
of comment.

Maximum Likelihood, Phil, *is* a really big workhorse of
statistical estim! ation, partly because the ML solutions share
certain fine characteristics ... which I don't call to mind.
Now, were you saying that there are specific drawbacks
that make MLE (the solutions of today, ones which happen
to be popular) poor for the "Subject:" of Missing Data?
-- I have not heard of that, but I could listen to argument.

But I guess I would be a tough sell, if you are saying there
is something vastly wrong with MLE, in general.

--
Rich Ulrich, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
- I need a new job, after March 31. Openings? -
.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
. http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ .
=================================================================


Phillip Good
http.ms//www.statistician.usa
"Never trust anything that can think for itself if you can't see where it keeps its brain."  JKR

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam

Reply via email to