Dennis Roberts wrote:

At 12:12 AM 3/25/2004, you wrote:

If I may add to the postings that preceded this one....

What is equally, or more, important is _how_ you use the measurements. the number of children per family in the USA is now around 2.2. No family has 0.2 children. But we still consider that the number, 2.2, has meaning. Thus, the number of children per family is discrete, but it is used as a continuous variable.


Well, what if you have a foster child ... ? Could that be a legit .2?

Treating a foster child as anything less than 'one of the family' is a sure path to problems. :)
Not to mention children in 'blended families'....


Maybe if we claim a snapshot in time, we could claim 0.2 'on the way.' :)

But who's counting?

Cheers,
Jay

--
Jay Warner
Principal Scientist
Warner Consulting, Inc.
4444 North Green Bay Road
Racine, WI 53404-1216
USA

Ph:     (262) 634-9100
FAX:    (262) 681-1133
email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:    http://www.a2q.com

The A2Q Method (tm) -- What do you want to improve today?



.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================

Reply via email to