Richard Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On 10 Apr 2004 09:37:16 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roger Levy)
> wrote:
> 
> [snip, earlier posts of his and mine]
> me > > Now you have confused me, a lot.
> > > By 'cases in the smaller group', I am using the common metaphor 
> > > of logistic regression, where the prediction is being made between
> > > cases and non-cases.
>  RL > 
> > Ah, I think I misunderstood you.  I'm not familiar with the
> > cases/non-cases terminology of logistic regression -- could you
> > explain this usage?
> 
> I will explain by way of providing this extract from a useful
> reference, which includes the point I was making - from 
> http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/logistic.htm
>  [ after a number of pages ]
> "How many independents can I have? 
> 
> "There is no precise answer to this question, but the more 
> independents, the more likelihood of multicollinearity. 
> Also, if you have 20 independents, at the .05 level of 
> significance you would expect one to be found to be 
> significant just by chance. A rule of thumb is that there 
> should be no more than 1 independent for each 10 cases in 
> the sample. In applying this rule of thumb, keep in mind 
> that if there are categorical independents, such as 
> dichotomies, the number of cases should be considered to 
> be the lesser of the groups (ex., in a dichotomy with 
> 500 0's and 10 1's, effective size would be 10). "
> ---- end of extract from Garson.

Thanks for the reference, but unfortunately it doesn't seem to use the
term "non-case" at all so this doesn't really answer my question.

> 
> You might find the whole document interesting to scan.
> [snip, more of mine]
> > 
> > By a "distinct covariate vector" I mean the following: with n
> > covariates (i.e., predictors) X_1,...,X_n, a covariate vector is a
> > value [x_1,...,x_n] for a given data point.  So, for example, if I
> > have a half-dozen binary covariates, there are 2^6=64 logically
> > possible covariate vectors.
> 
> Now I wonder what computer program you are using. 

I'm sorry, but I fail to see how that is relevant at all.  The idea of
a covariate vector is high-level and theoretical and has nothing to do
with implementation.  As a term, incidentally, "covariate vector" is
quite widespread (try searching for it in "Books" on Amazon) and I
don't see where the confusion is arising.
.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================

Reply via email to