In sci.stat.consult Art Kendall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I don't think it stands for anything.  I think it was just chosen to to 
: make a distinction from R factor analysis  which was done on an R 
: (correlation) matrix.  It was a very old method of cluster analysis, 
: first standardizing the variables then correlating cases.  The factors 
: were interpreted as clusters of cases.

Actually it refers to the item scaling, sorting items into categories.  here is 
an example

  Q Sort Representing Surgeon's Care
-4  -3  -2  -1   0  +1  +2  +3  +4
----------------------------------
 1   3  10   4   5   2  11   6  20
 9  21  13  18   7  14  12   8  24
        22  23  15  17  19
                16
   



: Neil wrote:
: > This may sound like a silly question, but for those of you are
: > familiar with Q-Sort Analysis / Q-Methodology, (a type of Factor
: > Analysis), does someone know what the "Q" actually stands for? 
: > 
: > I have found many journal articles and websites on this analysis/
: > methodology, but have not been able to find the above information in
: > any of my sources. A definitive reference where this information can
: > be found will help.
: > 
: > TIA
: > 
: > 

.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================

Reply via email to