>> I guess. >> >> Though I can't say I find there to be much consensus out there about what >> language features truly make for robust software development from group >> or community efforts.
>There's a long history of coders seeking consensus, but not arriving at any >set in stone answers (no carved tablets at the Smithsonian), in part >because the backdrop is always shifting, in terms of languages and >technologies. Interesting to read Paul Graham's article "The Hundred-Year Language" which - as noted in the article heading - was derived from his keynote at PyCon 2003. http://www.paulgraham.com/hundred.html """ Languages evolve slowly because they're not really technologies. Languages are notation. """ In his mind, (and I think in yours as well) computer languages are more like mathematical notation than a form of technology. And as such, evolution is slower - not at the pace of the changes in the underlying technology. Though certainly not uninfluenced by those developments. The most important technological development he seems to point to is the increasing raw power and speed of processors, which allow languages to design away from a preoccupation with performance issues. He thinks - though without great confidence in his intuition here - that Java is an example of a language headed down a dead-end evolutionary path. Than so must too be C#. Despite having some understanding that it must be annoying to hear high-fallutin theory from someone at my level in this domain, I persist. And it seems to me that the evolutionary successful language will include in its approach clear and concise constraints on its ambitions. If I am understanding "properties" mostly correctly, and in fact their reason for being is to allow for a fundamental midstream redesign of a program without alteration of that program's API, I am thinking something to the effect that it is only possible to do the impossible in half-measures, and half-measures are only half-measures and who wants to work in an environment of half-measures. I don't think mathematical notation, for example, includes the concept of the half-measure. Whatever. Art _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig