Hello, I have a very nuts-and-bolts question for you folks. I have found that the Livewires graphics routines behave differently under Python 2.4.1 than they do under 2.2.3. Specifically, under the former, in IDLE, if I interactively run >>> from livewires import * >>> begin_graphics() >>> circle(100,100,50, filled=True) >>>circle(300,300,70) >>> end_graphics() then nothing shows up until I run end_graphics(). The circles then shows up for moment, just before the graphics window is destroyed. If I run the same sequence under 2.2.3, the each circle shows up immediately when the command is executed. This latter behavior is what I want -- is there a way to make it work that way under 2.4?
(Why not just use 2.2? Because I'm also trying to work with RUR-PLE, which requires wxPython, and the versions of wxPython available on the web site are for 2.3 and 2.4. Perhaps it could all work with 2.2, but it would be nice not to have to experiment with all the permutations. And I really don't want to tell the kids "we have to use 2.2 for this but 2.4 for that", it really doesn't send the right message at this tender stage in their programming careers. . . better that they learn the bitter truth -after- they're hooked, eh?) Thanks, Andy Judkis Academy of Allied Health and Science Neptune, NJ _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig