kirby urner schrieb: > On 7/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> But, I remain willing to be wrong here. Just that there is an inevitability >> about other peoples' sense of where we are *necessarily* going that I don't >> share, >> and to the extent we *necessarily* get there I would like to be sure that we >> get there as something more than a prophecy, self-fulfilled. >> >> Art >> > > I think we each have a responsibility to trailblaze, to pioneer, in > the direction of a future we consider promising and attainable. > > We don't all share the same vision, but in expressing our respective > preferred futures as clearly as we're able, we at least have something > to bring to the table. > > I think you bring a lot to the table, and do responsibly demonstrate > what you consider worthy of study and further development (Euclid, > Klein, Pygeo etc.). > Regardless of the subject line your and Arthur's discussions seem to have some strange attractor. (Just an observation. Or am I wrong?) Gregor > Kirby > _______________________________________________ > Edu-sig mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig > > >
_______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
