On 16/07/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
 
But in the end I think we need to converge - if we are to converge -
around a respect for science and its methods.

Wow  <shocking/>... what makes you think that Alan Kay doesn't respect science and its methods ?

 
What I consider to be the "assault on my sensibilities" is Kay claiming an
exception for himself, to the rules of the game. 

I'm not sure I understand, what Alan Kay is 'claiming' exactly ?

Are we to play by no rules whatsoever?

 "we" ? again I'm not sure what you mean exactly but Papert, Kay, Negroponte and friends are interested in "children first" .... that's where things become difficult to understand for teachers focused on *their* teaching  (and not on the various learning process of their pupils).


Seniority is not science. *That's* politics.

Major scientific breakthrough has been done by people having the courage of going against the established 'politically correct' representations of their time.

Science progress is by far not a linear process.

When you do *politics* (if you want to be elected) I guess you avoid to disturb the main beliefs/representations in place.

Am I to accept that I have nostalgia problem, an IQ problem,
bad eye sight?
 
Hard, when what I think that what I have is  a good view of the hand in
front of my face. And that this is what is causing my "problem".

Einstein said that it's  ~"hard to understand what you never experienced" and I believe that's why he also said that  "imagination is more important that knowledge" (ridding a photon to ~"experience" relativity, etc  ...).

Maybe you should work on your "imagination amplifier" ;)
http://www.rheingold.com/texts/tft/11.html

francois



Art 
 

 
 
 
 

_______________________________________________
Edu-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig



_______________________________________________
Edu-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig

Reply via email to