André, This is indeed good news and for my part seems to be the best solution. Thanks for putting together the proposal and lobbying on our behalf.
See you at PyCon... :) Cheers, Vern Ceder Andre Roberge wrote: > My apologies to those that feel annoyed I reply to one of my own post > (on December 22), without any other intervenor in between. > > The pre-PEP has received some attention, including some positive one > from GvR. Those interested to see his initial response can see it > here: > > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2006-December/005249.html > > Then, on December 23, he wrote: > --------------- > BTW, can someone clean up and check in the proto-PEP and start working > on an implementation or patch? Should be really simple. I'd like to > see a patch for the refactoring tool (sandbox/2to3) as well. > > --Guido > --------------- > > I take this as a very positive sign. Unfortunately, there appear to > have been no follow-up since. Perhaps it is because it was so late in > the year, and when everyone came back, the issue had been forgotten. > In any event, I plan to go to Pycon 2007 and, if it hasn't been > followed-up by then, do some lobbying on behalf of all those on > edu-sig who have manifested their support for this issue in the past. > > André > > P.S. Crunchy will be leading the way: I am planning to have support > for input()/raw_input() in the next release, and the semantic will be > that they will behave identically (i.e. return a string). It is > already implemented for the embedded interpreter in svn. > > On 12/22/06, Andre Roberge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi all- >> >> I finally got the time to do a follow-up on python-3000 based on my original >> message on edu-sig. >> >> Those interested can look it up here: >> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2006-December/005242.html >> >> As I don't subscribe to the python-3000 list, I probably won't do any >> follow-up; we'll see what comes out of the discussion. >> >> André >> >> >> On 9/13/06, Andre Roberge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi-all, >>> >>> Having had a look at the discussion on the Python-3000 mailing list, I >>> thought >>> it was appropriate to write a draft PEP with the intent of eventually >>> posting >>> it on the Python 3000 list for "serious" discussion/future decision. >>> >>> >> [snip] >> > _______________________________________________ > Edu-sig mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig -- This time for sure! -Bullwinkle J. Moose ----------------------------- Vern Ceder, Director of Technology Canterbury School, 3210 Smith Road, Ft Wayne, IN 46804 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 260-436-0746; FAX: 260-436-5137 _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
