Arthur wrote: > Particularly given this, I don't understand the embedded need, as part > of the process, to the compromise on some basic ideas - normally called > science. [...] Or - maybe more what he was > suggesting - is that until there is empricial evidence that leads us in > a certain and clear direction, best encourage the diversity of ideas. > OLPC seem to represent very much a counter vision. > Seems to me the OLPC has counter ideas on both empiricism *and* the > diversity of ideas.
I don't think I can actually figure out what you're saying here. I am happy to have a discussion, but that requires understanding what's being discussed; please consider rephrasing your concerns in very simple, non-philosophical terms. -- Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
