LMS / LRS Specs: - xAPI/TinCan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experience_API - SCORM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharable_Content_Object_Reference_Model
Interactive content specs - H5P https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H5P https://h5p.org https://h5p.org/documentation/developers/h5p-specification - xBlock (edX) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XBlock https://github.com/edX/XBlock https://open.edx.org/marketplace-all/ - https://github.com/edx/cookiecutter-xblock > This is a cookiecutter template for new XBlocks. > It enables creation of the XBlock repository as well as a Dockerfile for building and running your XBlock in the xblock-sdk workbench. - https://github.com/ibleducation/jupyter-edx-grader-xblock > Auto-grade a student assignment created as a Jupyter notebook, using the nbgrader Jupyter extension, and write the score in the Open edX gradebook - [ ] "H5P as an Open Edx XBlock extension" https://h5p.org/node/32382 H5P / XBlock <-> LMS / CMS <-> Credential Store LMS Learning Management System LRS Learning Record Store Credential Store, Repository See https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/#use-cases-and-requirements for normative language - Badgr (SQL database maintained by: ___) - https://OpenBadges.org - https://openbadges.org/about/participating-issuers/ - Badgr - blockchain (replicated immutable datastore) - https://blockcerts.org/ (W3C Verifiable Claims) >From https://www.blockcerts.org/guide/roadmap.html : > Verifiable Claims is a lightweight format for expressing a cryptographically verifiable claim across many different use cases. Blockcerts and Open Badges are working towards expressing Open Badges assertions as a Verifiable Claim. > This approach will expand (even further) the interoperability that exists within the Open Badge ecosystem. On Friday, January 25, 2019, Wes Turner <wes.tur...@gmail.com> wrote: > OpenBadges > > https://openbadges.org/get-started/issuing-badges/ > > > Open Badges provide a flexible way to recognize learning wherever it > happens, in and out of formal education and the workplace. They can > represent any achievement from simple participation to evidence-backed > competency development. > > > By adopting the Open Badges Specification you are joining over 3,000 > organizations across the world who believe in supporting a global > Specification that enables individuals to capture and share the richer > picture of who they are. > > edX supports Badgr (OpenBadges) > > - OpenBadges Backpack is now Badgr > - https://badgr.com > - https://github.com/concentricsky/badgr-server (Django API) > - https://github.com/concentricsky/badgr-ui (Angular 2 UI) > - https://edx.readthedocs.io/projects/edx-installing- > configuring-and-running/en/latest/configuration/enable_badging.html > - https://github.com/edx/credentials > > > Blockcerts (W3C Verifiable Claims) > > - https://www.blockcerts.org/guide/roadmap.html > - [ ] OpenBadges Verifiable Claims compatibility > > - https://github.com/w3c/verifiable-claims > - https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/ > - https://w3c.github.io/vc-use-cases/#education > > > ... https://gist.github.com/westurner/4345987bb29fca700f52163c339a270f > > > On Thursday, January 24, 2019, kirby urner <kirby.ur...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi Charles (fond memories from Google App Engine days... we met at a >> Pycon in Chicago years ago)... >> >> Issuing some proof of completion, in certificate form (an actual document >> with their name on it, could be PDF) helps your enrollees put something on >> their resume. The other half of that equation is not a big name school or >> company, though that might help, so much as a detailed course outline >> and/or the actual course content, or both -- such that those following up >> on this credential get a sense of what it means. >> >> What did these students actually work through? Were there projects? >> Quizzes. Describing the program helps too (including with recruiting new >> enrollees). >> >> When O'Reilly School of Technology closed its doors, I was clear that the >> best way to support our alumni was to preserve a record of what we offered, >> so those advertising completing our courses could point to something >> objective, in terms of content covered. OST listened and our content is >> still online to this day. >> >> Example pages: >> >> http://archive.oreilly.com/oreillyschool/courses/programs.html >> http://archive.oreilly.com/oreillyschool/courses/courses.html >> http://archive.oreilly.com/oreillyschool/courses/Python1/index.html >> >> We show our quizzes, but not our projects, not sure why at this point. >> >> Students had to finish all the projects, which were assessed by their >> human instructors. We had no robo-grading whatsoever, not even for >> quizzes, as we wanted them to know they had a real human on the other end. >> >> Of course a lot of the code camp type websites don't provide actual >> instructors to sign off on work, as you know. They may have students >> aseess each other (or not), ala Coursera, which, in combination with >> deadlines, means not everyone who starts, manages to finish. >> >> Attrition stats may or may not be relevant in your case. If they got a >> credential for just showing up (attendance), that's of course not as >> impressive, so you do your students a favor by advertising the rigors of >> your offerings. >> >> Kirby >> >>
_______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig