Looks ok to me Thank You, Kris Hestad, MCP Sr. Computer Specialist Faculty Center University Of Central Florida 4000 Central Florida Blvd. CL1-207 Orlando, FL 32816-0066 407-823-3544 www.fctl.ucf.edu
>>> Oliver Grawert <[email protected]> 12/7/2009 8:53 AM >>> hi, Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 13:53 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > Hi, > > The following source packages: > - are in universe or multiverse > - are not in Debian unstable > - have not been updated in Ubuntu since Ubuntu hardy (=> same version in > hardy and lucid) > - are installed on less than 0.1% of Ubuntu systems, according to popcon > (=> popcon < 1400 installations) > > I have gone through each of them, and I think that they are good > candidates for removal from Ubuntu. Could you please go through the > list, and try to find packages that should be kept for some reason? > # packages that were apparently never part of Debian (at least they > # weren't in etch or lenny) ... > sugar-sliderpuzzle-activity > sugar-flipsticks-activity > sugar-jigsawpuzzle-activity ... > squeak-plugin-image > squeak-sources3 ... > sugar-logviewer-activity ... > sugar-connect-activity ... > sugar-memorize-activity for these packages the edubuntu people used to care, i think the squeak packages come from a time where debian refused to include squeak at all due to its licensing (i think this changed ...) and the sugar components come from a disagreement between the ubuntu and debian sugar teams, i'm cross-sending this to edubuntu-devel so the edubuntu team can take a look ... ciao oli -- edubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/edubuntu-devel
