On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 12:37, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > I wonder if for clarity sake we should be reffered as open source more than > free > software, just to get the Free -> Theft word association.
I guess you could have Open Source that still required one to pay a license fee to use so the FAST goons could still hound you. Unless the license allows free use, the condition of the source code is immaterial. But I'd say use whichever term the audience is likely to understand. On a different issue, at the San Diego Linux Summit I met Alberto Armengol and Ricardo Strusberg from Venezuela. They have agreed to translate the INGOT handbook etc into Spanish. I also had interest from someone from Mexico who new tham and said he would get the information from them. I have trained Armengol and Ricardo as Gold Assessor trainers so tha they can train others in their countries. Thought you might be interested due to your regional and language connections. In Poland we will soon have 50 assessors so things are going well. -- Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZMS Ltd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
