Hi, [Michael Truog:] > A concrete example for what I had meant by "a dirty trick" is the > test module at the end of the email. That approach required using > -Wspecdiffs which generates a lot of noise that isn't helpful (and > isn't recommended as you mentioned).
FWIW. It'll be possible in Erlang/OTP 18 to avoid the noise generated by -Wspecdiffs by instead saying that the warning option should apply to a certain function, see https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/483. In your example: -dialyzer({specdiffs, httpc_method_assert/1}). There haven't been much discussion about your suggestion. Maybe the "dirty trick" is a feasible work-around until we know if there is a more spread demand? Best regards, Hans Bolinder, Erlang/OTP team, Ericsson _______________________________________________ eeps mailing list [email protected] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps
