On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Michael Truog <[email protected]> wrote: > Could we please add a FUNCTION macro which returns the name of the function > as an atom and a FUNCTION_ARITY macro that returns the "name/arity" as a > string? Those should cover a common desire in Erlang source code and would > eliminate any functionality benefit when implementing logging with a parse > transform over all source code when compared to logging that relies on > macros.
Not to this EEP. Having a FUNCTION macro is probably not controversial in the same way as conditional compilation, so it should be a separate EEP. /Bjorn -- Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB _______________________________________________ eeps mailing list [email protected] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps
