A minor question: why is it -if and -elif and not -if() and -elif() so it is consistent with -ifdef()?
Robert On 16 October 2015 at 12:25, Björn Gustavsson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Raimo Niskanen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > New - EEP 44: Additional preprocessor directives > > > > I have posted a new draft of the EEP and sent > a email to erlang-questions. Please keep further > discussion about the EEP in the thread in > erlang-questions. > > Here is a list of the major changes in draft 2: > > * version(App) now returns a list instead of a tuple. > > * The is_module/1 built-in has been clarified. > > * The rules for expressions in -if/-elif have been changed and clarified. > > * There is a new -warning directive. > > * There is a new -if/-elif built-in function: is_deprecated/3. > > * There is a new section about backwards compatibility. > > * Miscellaneous minor corrections and clarifications. > > /Björn > > -- > Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB > _______________________________________________ > eeps mailing list > [email protected] > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps >
_______________________________________________ eeps mailing list [email protected] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps
