I prefer that. I like when you can comment out or delete a line to reach the 
desired effect. :-)

Another idea I had was that options could allow for a single option, e.g. 
-doc(hidden), or a map in case more options are added in the future, e.g. 
-doc(#{hidden => true}).

Cheers,
Adam

> On 2. Jun 2021, at 19:03, José Valim <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Adam, thanks for the feedback.
> 
> About point 1, what do you think about this:
> 
> -doc "foobar".
> -doc hidden.
> 
> For the cases you want to document but then hide it?
> 
> José Valim
> https://dashbit.co/
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 7:00 PM Adam Lindberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> First of all, nice initiative!
>> 
>> Two comments:
>> 
>> (1) I think the hidden setting should be a different attribute or argument 
>> rather than take the place of the actual documentation. I think there’s 
>> value in allowing to fully documentation a module and all its functions 
>> (including private ones). 
>> 
>> I would suggest two options: either (a) add a -docopts attribute that can 
>> modify the following -moduledoc or -doc attribute, or (b) support an 
>> additional argument to the doc attributes, e.g. -doc(hidden, “The 
>> documentation.”).
>> 
>> I think tools could show hidden documentation in a nice way if requested by 
>> the user, for example. Or, you could easily hide a new API until it is ready 
>> to be released, and then just remove the hidden flag.
>> 
>> (2) I would not keep the existing syntax for EDoc and its generation to 
>> HTML. I’d very much prefer a modern standardized format instead. 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Adam
>> 
>>>> On 2. Jun 2021, at 13:34, José Valim <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Abstract: This EEP draft proposes a structured documentation API for Erlang 
>>> where the documentation is handled as part of the language parser and 
>>> included directly in the compiled .beam files, as a replacement for EDoc. 
>>> Python, Elixir, and Clojure are examples of languages that follow this 
>>> approach of treating documentation as data rather than code comments.
>>> 
>>> Pull request here: https://github.com/erlang/eep/pull/24
>>> 
>>> Feedback is welcome.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> eeps mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps
_______________________________________________
eeps mailing list
[email protected]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps

Reply via email to