https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/5216
Peer Stritzinger and I have worked on a first sample implementation for Spawnfest. The details are in the pull request, but we'd like to discuss the implementation to move this forwards. On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 10:03 AM Kenneth Lundin <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we should merge it and take the discussion from there. > > Would be good to get a solution that can be part of OTP 25, at least that > is my intention right now. > > > > /Kenneth > > > > > > *From:* Fred Hebert <[email protected]> > *Sent:* den 5 mars 2021 14:26 > *To:* Björn Gustavsson <[email protected]> > *Cc:* José Valim <[email protected]>; Kenneth Lundin < > [email protected]>; eeps <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [eeps] EEP 049: Value-Based Error Handling Mechanisms > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 9:15 PM Fred Hebert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Before going for a reference implementation (I'd love to get this done in > time for OTP-24 but frankly I don't think I'll be solid enough to get it > ready), I decided to take the time to at least update the EEP as per the > comments in this thread and our latest discussions: > > > > https://github.com/erlang/eep/pull/18 > > > > This should now cover adjusted rationales, move all the older forms of the > proposal to an alternative version that was dismissed, and all the examples > have been rewritten to the new form to account for what was debated here. > > > > > > Hi, this hasn't moved since December, I was wondering if the new form of > EEP was worth merging/discussing at this point before implementation work > goes forth? >
_______________________________________________ eeps mailing list [email protected] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps
