On 2018-03-19 20:26, Andreas Reichel wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 06:44:29PM +0800, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> +int ebg_env_gc_register_var(ebgenv_t *e, char *key); >> >> This reads to me like "garbage-collect register var". Shouldn't it be >> "register garbage-collected var" (register_gc_var)? > > The logic is to have categoric naming from left to right. > For example, ebg_env... are functions belonging to ebg environment. > The same way ebg_env_gc are all functions belonging to the garbage > collector. Just because we have only one does not make that a > bad idea to me.
Ok, that depends on the POV, apparently. I wouldn't have a expected an "ebg environment - garbage collector" subsystem. Jan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "EFI Boot Guard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/efibootguard-dev/c0d0ce62-458c-38c6-e6b3-b84f3d6db380%40siemens.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
