Hi Jan,
> ...except that --update already exists and has a different semantic.
this got me thinking: -u is a no-op if -f is also specified [1].
Thus, it would be possible to re-use this parameter for the purposes of my
patch. Of course, if people rely on this
no-op (without knowing), they might be surprised.
Kind regards,
Michael
[1]
https://github.com/siemens/efibootguard/blob/c8ad20f36145bb4cd5a61549fd96bb7cbde0f144/tools/bg_setenv.c#L684
--
Michael Adler
Siemens AG
T RDA IOT SES-DE
Otto-Hahn-Ring 6
81739 München, Deutschland
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jim Hagemann Snabe;
Vorstand: Roland Busch, Vorsitzender; Klaus Helmrich, Cedrik Neike, Matthias
Rebellius, Ralf P. Thomas, Judith Wiese; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin und
München, Deutschland; Registergericht: Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 12300,
München, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "EFI
Boot Guard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/efibootguard-dev/20211006084035.xehmr5kgehcpxves%40kratos.
