On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 22:22 -0400, Phillip Moore wrote: > OK, GSSAPI-ized, but that doesn't pronounce very well.... > GSSAPI'nated! :)
guh-sap-in-ated > Since we don't have anyone banging on our door wanting to bootstrap > anything (I haven't heard from ANY of our early adopters in many > weeks), I am debating what to do next. NFSv4 is very, very tempting > since I've read a lot about it in the last week or so, and it looks > relatively straight forward. We also need to think about backporting > the GSSAPI support into EFS 2, as well (which really won't be that > hard; to code OR to deploy). Hold off on planning anything just yet (at least until after tomorrow's team meeting), there's some "stuff" coming at us, which may deplete our resources just a bit, but they do eventually converge at NFSv4. > Regardless of where we go next, we can now say with confidence that > EFS has very robust and secure authentication. If we start using > NFSv4, we'll be able to say that about the underlying filesystem, > too. That's a huge milestone. Now let's see if we can't get people playing with things like ZFS and AFS under the hood, and make the underlying fs "pluggable". _______________________________________________ EFS-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openefs.org/mailman/listinfo/efs-dev
