Ah!! I found the wrong email... You clarified this in a followup. The AFS documentation is in a pretty pathetic state, I have to say. The changes I'm making to the Quick Start Guide are just a drop in the bucket of what's needed.
This magic syntax is VERY powerful, but I don't see it in ANY of the fs docs I've looked at so far. On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Steven Jenkins <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Phillip Moore > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Steve, are you sure that magic "fs mkmount" works? I'm setting up my > first > > AFS cell, using 1.4.12, since I wanted to work with pre-compiled binaries > to > > start, and keep things simple. fs doesn't like that syntax: > > [r...@fhcore ~]# fs mkmount > > /afs/d.fh.nyc.us.boot.efs:root.afs/.d.fh.nyc.us.boot.efs root.cell -rw > > fs: mount points must be created within the AFS file system > > (I forgot to create the rw mount, so I tried using the command which, if > it > > works, makes it unnecessary :-P) > > I can't find any documentation on this yet -- is this perhaps a feature > of > > 1.5? > > I'm pretty sure: I tested by doing ls of a public volume in a public cell. > > Note that your syntax is wrong. It should be > > fs mkmount /afs/.:mount/d.fh.nyc.us.boot.efs:root.afs/.d.fh.nyc.us.boot.efs > root.cell -rw > > I'll be on irc shortly.. > > Steven > _______________________________________________ > EFS-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.openefs.org/mailman/listinfo/efs-dev >
_______________________________________________ EFS-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openefs.org/mailman/listinfo/efs-dev
