That's a fair question. At this point I'd say Q2.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Steven Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Phillip Moore <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> > That actually brings up an important item: what exactly is EFS 3? There >> > is >> > no release tag in efs-core, much less something that crosses the various >> > git >> > repos to tag everything as being related with the EFS 3.X release. Is >> > anyone planning on making a set of tags? >> >> "EFS 3" is nothing more the master of all the current git repos, and >> is a moving target. As the website states, we're in the alpha >> stages, pre-prod. >> >> Once we have that first "official" release, then there will be a >> 3.000. We have not done that yet, and that's why ALL of the repos >> are versions 2.999, 0.999, etc. I am reserving the right to decide >> when to freeze this code and declare a 3.000, as the sole developer, >> lead architect, head master mind, etc. >> >> Realistically, I'll probably do this shortly before officially release >> EFS internally here to end users, and then follow more formal >> development procedure for changes. With ZERO USERS right now, I am >> able to move very, very quickly and I'm taking full advantage of that. > > > > When are you thinking the freeze will likely occur? > > Steven > > > _______________________________________________ > EFS-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.openefs.org/mailman/listinfo/efs-dev > _______________________________________________ EFS-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openefs.org/mailman/listinfo/efs-dev
