On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Phillip Moore
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Steven Jenkins
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I was looking through
>> gnu/gcc/efsdeploy/hooks/install-post/01_patch_specs as well as the
>> gcclib creation and have two questions:
>>
>> 1- what is the driver behind the following:
>>
>>         s{(\%\{\!nostdlib:\%\{\!nodefaultlibs:\%\(link_ssp\))}{$sequence
>> $1}gmsx;
>
> Just a simple, reliable way to get the change we want into the
> generated spec file.   Once I figured out how I wanted the spec file
> to change, I found a simple regexp that would get the job done
> generically.
>

I get the ideal in general, but I mean that line specifically: i.e.,
what problem(s) does that line fix? on which platform(s)?

>> 2- Also, if one is not building all the platforms natively (e.g.., you
>> aren't building x86-32 platforms but only the 64-bit ones), then
>> instead of using the $emulates logic with the merging that is done by
>> the gcclib creation's rsync, you can instead rsync over lib and lib64
>> separately, setting rpath32 to the lib and rpath64 to lib64.  Or is
>> there a problem with that approach?
>
> Well, that's a fair question.  You'll have to try that approach, build
> a lot of dependencies, and see what breaks.   I'd be very surprised if
> you can actually build only x86-64 binaries, and avoid building x86-32
> altogether, but feel free to try.
>
> What's there works, and works very well.   If you start changing it,
> be prepared for subtle downstream breakage that you'll have fun
> finding and fixing.

I agree with you that gratuitous changes to this are risky, but I do
not have access to 32-bit systems, so I don't see a lot of choice on
this (and various users have vendor-provided libraries that are
32-bit, so I have to support linking those).  Note that I'm building
with multilib support, so if I did produce 32-bit binaries (e.g.,
provide an x86-32.rhel.5, for example), then that would be
cross-compiled anyway, not native.

I'm definitely open to suggestions.

Thanks,
Steven
_______________________________________________
EFS-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.openefs.org/mailman/listinfo/efs-dev

Reply via email to