Thanks. On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Phillip Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > Support for building RHEL srpms has not been dropped at all. The > rhel/gcc efsdeploy rules are the same as the gnu/gcc efsdeploy rules, > because the only thing that's different is the source archive. How > you build them remains identical.
Ah, I had misunderstood the 'redirect' purpose. Got it. > [defaults] > platforms = x86-32.rhel.5 x86-64.rhel.5 > > Note that you also have to restrict (or should restrict) this build to > just the RHEL5 platforms. For RHEL6, I build *that* releases > compiler natively. > Why is RHEL 6 handled natively? Note that I'm working on RHEL 6 (rhel/gcc/4.4.6) and have run into a few problems, but I'm using an ancient version of efsdeploy, so I expect some of these problems are essentially self-inflicted. Thanks, Steven _______________________________________________ EFS-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openefs.org/mailman/listinfo/efs-dev
