Looks like the new 2.2 beta has group based web access polisies, this may
work for me but I'll probably wait till it goes production.  But will start
playing with it now....

Safe search is still an issue though....

On Feb 13, 2008 11:30 AM, AJ Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  I know it's rudimentary, but here's a thought if you're using Windoze PCs
> and IE (and probably other browsers) :
>
> - Make sure each user has their own account on the PC (Domain, AD,
> whatever).
> - Configure the youth users' profiles to go through the HTTP Proxy (say on
> 8080) and lock that configuration based upon administrative and/or Group
> Policy rights.
>
> This will enforce that all browser/http access goes through the proxy
> server, and thus content filter.
>
> To get a little more secure, should this be a valid possible-approach
> (up-to-now), you can write a TCP rule to re-direct all port 80 to 8080
> transparently on the PC (like a iptables entry -- but for Windoze).  I think
> you can do that on a policy (per-user) level, but I'm not too sure about
> that one.  (And if you can't do it per-user, it doesn't apply, because you'd
> just do it on the firewall.)
>
> So maybe that helps, maybe not.  YMMV? :)
>
> -AJ
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Gregory Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 13, 2008 11:52 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Efw-user] Content filter
>
> Mr. Bishop,
>
> I've been querying about this for a month now but no one seems to give an
> answer and the documentation seems to suggest otherwise. I have also been
> looking for an alternative solution to provide user based url filtering but
> no luck yet. Let me know if you find anything and I will do likewise.
>
> Regards,
> Gregory Ray
>
> On Feb 13, 2008 6:36 AM, Tom Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to tailor the content filter to a certain group or
> > individual machines.   I am in a group setting Church and I would like to
> > have the youth group  PC's much more restrictive than the adult staff.  The
> > second thing I am looking fo is a way to restrict google and yahoo searches
> > to being "safe" search only to minimize image and video image search.
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Efw-user mailing list
> > Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
> >
> >
>  ------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Efw-user mailing list
> Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Efw-user mailing list
> Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user

Reply via email to