Il giorno Sun, 2 Nov 2008 21:17:53 +0100 Raphael Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Hi, > > I once wrote a natural_8 class, which is now in common/broken. What > do you think about that? > > I personally think, that NATURAL_? classes should make it into the se > libs, but I actually do not know what to think about the se team. - > They do not even answer on my mails. I don't understand why and I am > somehow discouraged to suggest (again) to put the NATURAL classes > into se. I think the solution I tried was good and fits the wrapper > case fine. > > What do you think? Shall I get them working again (BTW, I do not see > what is broken, atm.) and implement the other sized friends? I reinstalled SmartEiffel recently from the scratch using snapshots, NATURALs seems to be fully implemented at compiler level, therefore your implementation is not needed anymore. Let me tell you that your work has been nevertheless useful because I'm convinced that *your* classes and *your* insistence pushed Dominique to put workforce into NATURALs implementation at compiler level and made them develop the external type framework. Paolo _______________________________________________ Eiffel-libraries-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/eiffel-libraries-devel
