Both companies offer a caching mechanism that works along the lines of an
object database, but I am not aware that they will eventually flush this
data to an RDBMS. Unfortunately, our company (and the majority of
organizations) still need the warm, fuzzy feeling that comes with an RDBMS
such as Oracle or Sybase.
jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian N. Miller
> Sent: Friday, February 26, 1999 9:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Inter-Object Business Rules & EJB Transactions
>
>
> >It would be great if a certain
> >vendor of a successful EJB product would allow elements from
> it's persistent
> >cache to eventually be flushed to an RDBMS, but be available in
> their latest
> >state at all times in the cache.
>
> Doesn't GemStone, Persistence, or some other do that? I
> remember reading something similar to what you describe.
>
> ==================================================================
> =========
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include
> in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
>
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
