Jim Rhyne wrote:

> Vlada,
> ...

> BTW, one of the issues brought up at the Inprise EJB Workshop was lack of
> support for singletons. There things are really necessary - some applications
> will just not work
> without them.
>

I fully agree here ...

Vlada wrote

> Many EJB servers cannot support singleton objects. For example, some
> servers require that there is a separate JVM for each client context, either
> for
> security reasons, or simply this is how their runtime is implemented. We
> intentially didn't
> want to put anything into EJB that would require platform vendors to route
> calls
> from multiple clients to a single instance.

... and here not. I think the argument is particularly lame. At the end of the
day you need to make to the application programmer happy and not the vendor
(says the vendor :-)

Cheers,

Andreas
--
"Programming with EJB, JTS and OTS" is now available. Collect all three!
begin:vcard
n:Vogel;Andreas
tel;fax:+1 650 655 3950
tel;home:+1 415 643 8827
tel;work:+1 650 358 3037
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.wiley.com/compbooks/vogel
org:Inprise Corp.
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Strategic Technology Adviser
adr;quoted-printable:;;951 Mariners' Island Blvd.=0D=0ASuite 120;San Mateo;CA;94404;USA
x-mozilla-cpt:;-6336
fn:Andreas Vogel
end:vcard

Reply via email to