It occurs to me that there have been OODBMSs out there for quite some time now. I've never worked with ODBMSs, so I wonder: when you have a graph of objects, and you need to interrogate each one to find the value of some field, what do you do? If the object in question doesn't provide accessor/mutator methods for the datum in question, are you out of luck? I've seen references to "OQL" (which I assume is similar to SQL, but with extensions for objects); is that a standard, generally-applicable querying language? =========================================================================== Tom Valesky -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.patriot.net/users/tvalesky =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
- findLargeAccounts - why bother? Tim Shephard
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Tom Valesky
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Karl-Fredrik Blixt
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Vlada Matena
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Richard Monson-Haefel
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Imre Kifor
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Ian McCallion
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Chip Wilson
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Sachin Aggarwal
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Tom Valesky
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Eric Hughes
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Nipun Sehgal
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Ian McCallion
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Richard Monson-Haefel
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Imre Kifor
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Chip Wilson
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Imre Kifor
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Ian McCallion
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Ian McCallion
- Re: findLargeAccounts - why bother? Anne Thomas
