> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Roman [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 16, 1999 2:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: sessions wrapping entities
>
> My counter argument to this is: your code has to always be prepared to
> deal
> with consequences of servers crashing, networks going down, and other
> systems-level problems. A session timeout is yet another systems-level
> problem you need to deal with.
>
[Frentress, James] <snip> without losing functionality... if you
could eliminate "servers crashing", would you do it? if you could eliminate
"networks going down", would you do that? (i'll make a great leap and assume
nobody is answering 'no'). all we're saying is that you can eliminate
session timeout without losing functionality.
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
