well, we didn't have fancy names like 'business events' back in 1982 when we melded message switches and transaction managers. but whatever floats it. --b At 09:32 PM 5/20/99 , Mark Hapner wrote: >EJB/JMS can be used to solve this problem; however, it should be noted >that the >main benefit of integrating JMS with EJB is to enable notification driven >application integration, i.e. 'business events'. =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
- Parallel processing in session bean Grove, Andy
- Re: Parallel processing in session bean Tony Holderith
- Re: Parallel processing in session bean Bob Pasker
- Re: Parallel processing in session bean Mark Hapner
- Re: Parallel processing in session bean bob pasker
- Re: Parallel processing in session bean Chamberlain Steve
- Re: Parallel processing in session bean Mark Hapner
- Re: Parallel processing in session bean Robert Patrick
- Re: Parallel processing in session bean MARK HAPNER
- Re: Parallel processing in session bean Colin Smith
- Re: Parallel processing in session bean Tom Valesky
- Re: Parallel processing in session bean Mark Hapner
- Re: Parallel processing in session bean Tom Valesky
- Re: Parallel processing in session bean MARK HAPNER
- Re: Parallel processing in session bean ReJ
