Hey

Constantine Plotnikov wrote:
>
> I think that for different homes there are different contexts.

That's what I thought too...

> BTW I'm very amused why not return JNDI Context from
> EJBContext. There will be the same URL for all beans
> and it will be simpler and faster to get it from
> EJBContext then to create it in specific bean context.
> (Vlada or Mark, could you please explain it?).

Agree.

> Considering it, implementing support for example
> in B7 (p 288) in nontrivial. It is implementable
> for example by setting thread context for bean
> before bussiness method call, but why container
> implementers need to deal with those problems
> at all.

That's the impl. solution I came up with as well. Pretty
straightforward, but I feel uneasy to have the JNDI impl. rely on
pre-call thread context settings...doesn't "feel" right somehow...

/R

--
Rickard �berg

@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to