Andreas Vogel wrote:
>
> When using RMI-over-IIOP, you just take your home and remote interfaces and run
> them through an java2idl and that's it.
That's fine, except that I think that John was looking to support
clients using various different languages, presumably some of them
would not be not Java. How many languages is the OBV mapping specified
for at this point?
What's really lacking in the EJB to CORBA mapping is a decent
alternative Java to IDL mapping to support pre-CORBA 2.3 clients
in a uniform way across vendors (things like Java String maps to
IDL 'string', serializable objects map to IDL 'struct' types where
possible, etc.)
I know it is sometimes possible to write a CORBA wrapper object for
each EJB in such a way that the client can use pre-CORBA 2.3 IDL (no
OBV in particular) to talk to the EJB. But how many customers want to
be building CORBA wrapper objects for their EJBs?
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Kidd [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > ...
> > > We want to implement our solution with EJB but use CORBA for communication
> > > because we will have different language
> > > clients.
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
