Re: Modelling Read Only Database Tables

[Karl-Fredrik Blixt]

"Lahooti, Hamid" wrote:
>
> It's not that dumb. The container cannot afford to keep every
> bean instance that it creates, active. It's easy keeping the
> ejb objects, they do not have state.
>
It's dumb since it's throwing away an instance which will most likely be used
pretty soon. It should instead implement some kind of LRU algorithm to keep
track of which instances that should be passivated.

regards
/Kalle
--
At a French Hotel: "A sports jacket may be worn to dinner, but no trouser."
Karl-Fredrik Blixt
Computer Science student at LiTH, Sweden
Homepage: http://travel.to/kp
Telephone: +46-(0)13-17 99 29
Cellular: +46-(0)739-87 11 03
ICQ: 4744258

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".