I guess my question was not very clear...
here it goes again
1) is there any restriction against synchronizing?
2) if there is one, what is it?
-----Original Message-----
From: Kirk Pepperdine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: having a PRIVATE synchronized method in a session EJB
I believe the restriction is against threading. Given this, there is
no need to synchronize.
Kirk
-----Original Message-----
From: David Olivares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, January 10, 2000 7:52 AM
Subject: having a PRIVATE synchronized method in a session EJB
>hi there,
>I need to have a PRIVATE synchronized method in a session EJB. I know the
specs don't allow me to have a synchronized methods in EJBs, but I'm not
sure if having a PRIVATE synchronized method is also forbidden. A way
around this will be to have a helper class that does the synchronization for
me, which I think is allowed in the specs.
>thanks in advanced
>David :)
>
>===========================================================================
>To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
>of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
