Assaf Arkin wrote:
> Theoretically you could just use RMI for remote objects and O/R for
> persistence. So why do you use EJB? Because EJB sits at a high level and
> does more stuff than RMI or O/R, including security, transactions, TP
> monitoring, etc.

Right.  You'd also expect that your stateless session beans, to take an
example that ticks me off, should be able to do parallelized workflows.
But without a Thread API this is impossible.

Cheers,
Laird

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to