"Bhattacharyya, Ana" wrote: > also I cannot > do this check in two queries (first check the timestamp and then update) as > they cannot be made atomic. > correct me if I am wrong. > You use the for update clause when selecting the timestamp value. This will lock the record. --Victor =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
- Re: Serialized Access James Cook
- Re: Serialized Access Victor Langelo
- Re: Serialized Access Jean-Baptiste Nizet
- Re: Serialized Access James Cook
- Serialized Access - few more questions? B.V.Murali Krishna
- Re: Serialized Access Thomas Preston
- Re: Serialized Access Toby Martin
- Re: Serialized Access Hussman, David
- Re: Serialized Access James Cook
- Re: Serialized Access Bhattacharyya, Ana
- Re: Serialized Access Victor Langelo
- Re: Serialized Access Bhattacharyya, Ana
- Re: Serialized Access James Cook
- Re: Serialized Access Juan Pablo Lorandi
- Re: Serialized Access Bhattacharyya, Ana
- Re: Serialized Access Juan Pablo Lorandi
