We Pramati for our development. It is the only software we came across that
gives totaly integrated development environment for JSP/servlet & EJB. The
development time is drastically reduced. If you have to use other products,
there are a lot of user intervention. With Pramati Studio 1.1, You develop
JSP, EJB (Pramati generates the basic frame work for you) and deploy JSPs
and EJBs all from one application (or one user interface). Other application
we came across you had to develop application in one application (user
interface) and deploy in another. Pramati is also very intelligent in
telling you what steps you need to take before you are ready to deploy. You
have the option of viewing Pramati generated code as well (with Pramati's
permission I suppose).
I recommend Pramati strongly to from a novice to experts.
-Krishna
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 August 2000 12:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What to play with EJB which server?
Are you simply using Orion with your own applications?
I used defaultWebApp with Orion and I was trying to figure out where
to put my ejb stuff but I think I'll just create a application under
applications instead of hopefully Orion will deploy correctly.
Orion will deploy from applications/ only right?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Endres
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 6:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: What to play with EJB which server?
>
>
> > OK I'm looking for a free EJB/JSP implementation that I can
> experiment with.
> > I've already used Orion for JSP stuff but I'm worried , due to
> the lack of
> > documentation, that it will take up too much of my time getting
> EJB stuff
> > working. Are my fears founded or should I stick with Orion?
>
> Our experience has been that Orion was the easiest, and most stable, to
> work with, even _with_ the poor documentation! And a good performer.
>
> We could not get jBoss to work, even with documentation. But that may
> be our own shortcomings. The problem was in their dependance on an XML
> tool to deploy, which we could not get to work at all. I wish they would
> just read the XML files without the GUI tool!
>
> Jonas is EJB 1.0, so was not acceptable. But straightforward to get up
> and running. Uses make, which I am comfortable with.
>
> HTH,
> tim.
>
> ==================================================================
> =========
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include
> in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
