Hello Marco,
> JMS seems to me as a solution for a-synchronous messaging.
> I want (near)real-time information..
JMS can be very efficient. You need to decide what you mean by "near
real-time". a few seconds? mili-seconds? ...
Anyway, if your current system is willing to accept waiting 2 minutes for a
timeout to occur, I am sure that JMS will be more than efficient for this
task ;)
> Do you still think JMS is an option ?
> Or do you have other suggestions ?
You may have a subsystem that continously checks for available data on this
server through sockets. When data is found, it is forwarded in a JMS
message. On your EJB server, a Message Driven Bean (MDB) would then
automagically receive this message and take appropriate action (call another
bean, ...)
cheers,
Sacha
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
