>locks
you don't have to lock a stateless session bean since only one client can
access it (theoretically) at one time :)
Filip
~
Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
~
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.filip.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Cook
> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 2:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Entity beans vs DAO(Data Access Objects)
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Filip Hanik
>
> > well, consider a clustered server environment where you will
> have to keep
> > transactional locks synchronized across servers in a distributed
> > transaction.
>
> It doesn't matter. If you had stateless session beans spread out across
> these servers, and they needed to participate in the same transaction, you
> would get the same results.
>
> jim
>
> ==================================================================
> =========
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include
> in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
>
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".