At 15:40 05.05.2001 , you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Several people on this list have advocated the return of remote
>relationships to EJB 2.0. I appreciate the utility of the concept, but
>I also see a few possible problems with the concept as described
>in PFD1. I was hoping that some advocates of remote relationships
>might want to address these concerns. Also, I have a possible
>solution to the "remote relationship" problem using PFD2, on which
>I would appreciate feedback.
>
>_Concerns_
-snip
I'm not sure about all the others but I don't have a particularly big
problem if the scope of a role-source would be limited to the same J2EE
application (just as ejb-link) as opposed to the same ejb-jar. That way all
3 concerns would not be a problem because it would still be one container.
If I understand the concerns people have brought up correctly, the main
counter argument (at least mine) was manageability of applications because
of the requirement of having to put all ejbs interacting via CMP
relationships in one ejb-jar would break any sensible packaging strategy
people are employing right now. I know, I'm repeating myself but could
anyone explain to me what the problem is with extending the scope of
relationship-role-source to the entire J2EE aplication by whatever means?
What am I missing?
Regards,
Robert
(-) Robert Kr�ger
(-) SIGNAL 7 Gesellschaft f�r Informationstechnologie mbH
(-) Br�der-Knau�-Str. 79 - 64285 Darmstadt,
(-) Tel: 06151 665401, Fax: 06151 665373
(-) [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.signal7.de
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
